Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(December 1996) 		 
Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]
Subject: Re: "Re[6]: subject"
From: jms @ tardis . Tymnet . COM (Joe Smith)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 96 16:33:08 PST
To: list-managers @ greatcircle . com 
In reference to the subject lines of
	Subject
	Re: Subject
	Re[2]: Subject
	Re[4]: Subject
	Re: Re[4]: Subject
which mailer is responsible for the abomination of adding "[n]" after "Re:"?

Isn't there an RFC that states "thou shalt not change 'Re:' to anything else"?

	-Joe
Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: LSOFT's Listserv vs. LYRIS
From: tasos@cs.bu.edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas)
Next: Re: Lyris
From: jms@tardis.Tymnet.COM (Joe Smith)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: LSOFT's Listserv vs. LYRIS
From: tasos@cs.bu.edu (Anastasios Kotsikonas)
Next: Re: "Re[6]: subject"
From: Robert Mah <rmah@angel.net>
Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com