AO>> Brian J. Murrell wrote:
AO>>
AO>> OK. In a week I've gotten something like 5 spams via the list-managers
AO>> list. Mouse-nuts in comparison to the spam I get from other sources, but
AO>> every little bit helps.
AO>>
AO>> Can we change the status of list-managers such that only recipients are
AO>> allowed to post? Please?
AO>I concur...But, if the list is closed to members only...than a "smart spammer
AO>( an oxymoron ?) can still bother to subscribe to the list
AO>first and than still
AO>send out his spamm as a member of the list :-(
AO> - at least that keeps out the "casual spammer"
AO>I wonder why thur/Fri was bad days for us to receive all those spams...
The other option, of course, is subscription confirmation, which makes
subscription too troublesome for many spammers.
___
X SLMR 2.1a X Tis far better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
--
>> David B. Smith Email sysop@atbbs.com, dbsmith@izzy.net
>> Sysop, American Tune BBS "The cure for all the ills of Democracy
>> is more Democracy!" -- NY Gov. Al Smith
>>
>> My views are sometimes not even my own, much less anyone else's.
>> My employers don't necessarily speak for me, either, 'natch.
References:
|
|
