Great Circle Associates List-Managers
(March 1997)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: JUNO problems
From: "Alan S. Harrell" <ashandrr @ tgn . net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 00:41:56 -0600
To: list-managers @ GreatCircle . COM

At 01:59 PM 3/10/97 -0500, Bonnie wrote:
>
>Just FYI, there is a list where you can discuss Juno to your heart's content:
>
>juno_accmail-digest@world.std.com
>
>I believe it's a majordomo list; there is also of course a non-digest version,
>but it's a pretty active list.

 Yes, it is a Majordomo.  I'd categorize it as a medium output list.

>Chuq's note has already been posted there, no real backlash yet, but a 
>bit of disappointment (is how I'd characterize the reaction).  I think the
>list has either some Juno employees on it or else people who know their 
>addresses.  It's mainly their users, though, discussing everything from
>the message size restrictions, loss of the 800 number, and bugs.

 Tsk, tsk.  I betcha Chuq's ears were burning.  You shoulda heard
 the nasty things they said about him on the Juno_accamil List.
 Ole Chuq even tried to post to the List, but I hear that mean 
 list owner don't allow no one to post to his list, lest 'n they
 be subscribers.  Ole Chuq just wasted bandwith and caused a bounce
 to be had.  

>About the limit:
>We keep our digests shorter for both our Juno subscribers (about 2.5% of
>our subscribers)...

 Thank you.  It's list owners like yourself that give the Internet
 a good name. 

>...and also Prodigy Classic members, who can receive larger messages, but 
>after about 31K, the messages get converted into awkward "attachments" that 
>must be downloaded. (If they use EMC, things are simplified, and the serious 
>e-mailers do.)  This does result in about four digests a day for
>our more active lists.  I hope that will eventually regulate their volume and 
>increase the signal-to-noise ratio for those over-active lists (maybe five 
>out of our 150 lists). 

 The point I hope you are making, is that a list owner should never
 be so rigid as to not bend to the needs of their subscribers -- all
 of them without selective discrimination.

 Frankly, any list owner that goes nuts over a few bounces, should
 not be in the business.  Bounces should be treated as puzzles, not
 daemons...er...demons.

Alan
ASHandRR@TGN.net


Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Heads-up: list loop @ utk.edu
From: Nick Perry <nick@aboard.co.uk>
Next: Re: Clueless spam artist of the week...
From: "Alan S. Harrell" <ashandrr@tgn.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: JUNO problems
From: Brock Rozen <brozen@webdreams.com>
Next: Re: List-Managers-Digest V6 #53
From: "Joshua D. Baer" <josh@skyweyr.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com